Timetable and Abstracts

Stochastic Processes with Reinforcement
Berlin, November 3–6, 2026

The programme below is tentative and may still be subject to minor changes.

Tuesday, November 3

09:30–09:45Opening remarks
09:45–11:15Pierre Tarrès — Minicourse (Lecture 1)
11:15–11:45Coffee break
11:45–12:45Invited speaker 1
12:45–14:00Lunch break
14:00–15:00Invited speaker 2
15:00–15:30Coffee break
15:30–16:30Invited speaker 3
16:30–17:30Invited speaker 4

Wednesday, November 4

09:30–11:00Pierre Tarrès — Minicourse (Lecture 2)
11:00–11:30Coffee break
11:30–12:30Invited speaker 5
12:30–14:00Lunch break
14:00–15:00Invited speaker 6
15:00–15:30Coffee break
15:30–16:30Invited speaker 7
16:30–17:30Invited speaker 8

Thursday, November 5

09:30–11:00Pierre Tarrès — Minicourse (Lecture 3)
11:00–11:30Coffee break
11:30–12:30Invited speaker 9
12:30–14:00Lunch break
14:00–15:00Invited speaker 10
15:00–15:30Coffee break
15:30–17:00Discussion session: “Probability meets AI”

Friday, November 6

09:30–10:30Invited speaker 11
10:30–11:00Coffee break
11:00–12:00Invited speaker 12
12:00–12:15Closing remarks
12:15–13:30Lunch

Aurélien Garivier

Distributional Reinforcement Learning via Moment Matching

In reinforcement learning, an agent typically chooses at each time among a set of Markov kernels so as to maximize some utility function of her path. Distributional Reinforcement Learning (DistRL) aims at estimating the law of the obtained utility. We will present here a DistRL approach that leverage the exact computability of specific moments of the return distribution via generalized dynamic programming. This approach offers a principled and theoretically grounded alternative to existing DistRL policy evaluation and planning methods, with the key advantage to avoid the accumulation of approximations during the iterations. We study the accuracy of generic reconstruction methods of the full return distribution from its computed moments: we prove an error bound on the Wasserstein W1 distance that is independent of the horizon (or discount factor). Then, we focus on the use of the Maximum Entropy principle: under additional regularity assumptions, we prove a much stronger control of the error under the Kullback-Leibler divergence.

Stefan Großkinsky

Emergence of Monopoly in Non-linear Pólya Urns

Generalized Pólya urns with non-linear feedback are an established probabilistic model to describe the dynamics of competing agents in growth processes with reinforcement. We provide a comprehensive account of the possible asymptotic behaviour for a large general class of feedback, and describe in detail how monopolies emerge in a transition from sub-linear to super-linear feedback via hierarchical states close to linearity. Based on Rubin's exponential embedding, the tail asymptotics for losing agents is related to explosive birth processes conditioned on non-explosion. We also provide a scaling limit for the full time evolution of market shares for diverging initial market size, and apply this to model the dynamics of the wealth distribution through wages and capital returns. This is joint work with Thomas Gottfried (Augsburg).

Clemens Heitzinger

Convergence of Reinforcement-Learning Algorithms

Abstract to follow.

Markus Heydenreich

Preferential Attachment Trees with Vertex Death

Preferential attachment models are a popular class of random graphs that have received a wealth of attention in the last decades and are often used to model evolving networks. In such models, new vertices are added to the graph sequentially and new vertices are more likely to make connections with existing vertices that have a large degree. In recent work, we study a general preferential attachment model where vertices can both be added but can also be ‘killed’. Such killed vertices can no longer make new connections, whereas ‘alive’ vertices continue to make new connections. This models evolving networks that can both increase as well as decrease in size. We focus on ‘persistence of the maximum degree’: are the oldest alive vertices also the ones with largest degree? We uncover a novel regime in which killing of vertices makes such persistence entirely impossible. This is based on joint work with Bas Lodewijks.

Peter Mörters

Branching with selection and mutation

We investigate a stochastic model of a growing population subject to selection and mutation. In our model each individual carries a fitness which determines its mean offspring number. Many of these offspring inherit their parent’s fitness, but some are mutants and obtain a fitness randomly sampled from a fixed distribution. We find the precise rate of growth of the population, identify a regime where a condensation effect occurs and formulate a conjecture for the age and fitness distribution in the population.

Sillke Rolles

Restrictions of some reinforced processes to subgraphs

Processes with reinforcement have been extensively studied in the past decades. Linearly edge-reinforced random walk and the vertex-reinforced jump process are very special because they are mixtures of Markov chains and Markov jump processes, respectively. The restriction of the vertex-reinforced jump process to a subgraph turns out to be a mixture of vertex-reinforced jump processes on the subgraph. This property is used to prove a recurrence result for both the vertex-reinforced jump process and the edge-reinforced random walk on graphs of bounded degree where each edge is replaced by a series of sufficiently many edges. The talk is based on joint work with Margherita Disertori and Franz Merkl.

Nadia Sidorova

Edge-reinforced branching random walk on the triangle

Edge-reinforced random walk (ERRW) is a random process on the vertices of a graph that is more likely to cross the edges it has visited in the past. Depending on the strength of the reinforcement, one-dimensional ERRW can either exhibit localisation (eventually moving back and forth across a single edge) or remain transient. We consider a model where a single ERRW is replaced by an exponentially growing number of random particles, and we study its localisation properties on the simple triangle graph. Using the dynamical systems approach we analyse the frequencies with which the edges are traversed and prove their almost sure convergence. We discuss the scenarios when those frequencies become negligible for one or two edges (dominance). We also discuss the situation when an edge stops being traversed entirely (monopoly). This is a joint work with Giordano Giambartolomei.

Debleena Thacker

Tampered Memory Elephant Random Walk on the One-dimensional Integer Lattice

An Elephant Random Walk (ERW) is a discrete-time stochastic process where the next increment is determined by randomly selecting one of the previous steps from the entire history and either repeating it with probability \(p\) or flipping it with probability \(1-p\). This process demonstrates a phase transition into diffusive, critical, and superdiffusive regimes, with criticality at \(p=3/4\). One of the outstanding questions is whether one needs to sample from the entire history to observe this phase transition. To understand the role of memory, we introduce the Tampered Memory Elephant Random Walk (TMERW), where history is partitioned into two disjoint sets \(D_n\) and its complement. On \(D_n^c\), the dynamics are the same as an ERW, while on \(D_n\), the increments are replaced by independent innovations, thus having two competing driving components. We observe that if \(\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{\lvert D_n^c\rvert}{n} > \frac{1}{2},\) then a phase transition into diffusive, critical, and superdiffusive regimes is still observable, whereas if the limit is less than \(\frac{1}{2}\), there is only the diffusive regime. Thus, one-half emerges as the sharp breakpoint, and the superdiffusive regime (anomalous diffusion) persists only when we tamper with less than half of the memory. This is joint work with Vinita Mulay and Neeraja Sahasrabudhe.