Ulf Rehmann: Position Statement

From dml_wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

There is an impressive amount of digitized mathematical literature

available via the Internet. There are the big commercial publishers, but also, there is a tremendous amount of material distributed over various repositories wordlwide, collected by scientific libraries and other institutions.

However, all these repositories are

  • hard to find
  • by no means uniformly organized
  • often unwilling to share their content with others by exchange of data and software
  • partially expensive (commercial publishers)

and therefore

  • difficult to use.

Digitized material is

  • presented in complicated ways
  • technically in bad shape (e.g., no ocr)
  • subject to copyright conditions, since copyright is
    • owned by publishers (true almost always for recent material)
    • partially invented/created even by the repositories
      even for old content, which is already out of authors' copyright.

Conclusion:

Even though we have digitized a significant fraction of our literature,
this fraction is not easy to find nor to access nor to use.

What should be done? (An idealistic perspective)

  • Encourage all repositories to support that central registry actively (e.g., by presenting public OAI records or equivalent for their material).
  • Give recommendations concerning copyright and maintenance of digital resources, which encourage the distribution of data and the mirroring at many places. Keep in mind: this gives a proactive (and cheap!) basis for long term preservation: compare the Stanford LOCKSS philosophy ("Lots Of Copies Keep Stuff Safe!").
  • Good models for a non centralized, user driven development of the DML are given by the
    • Open Software movement
    • Wikipedia movement
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox